<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is the loneliest number&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/</link>
	<description>Casually fanatic:  Wishywashy since the 20th century</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-114</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-114</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the plug for Blog :p I didn't realize that my app compared that well with a $400 app &amp;#38;lt;vbg&amp;#38;gt; As for webdav support, somebody did ask me about that for Blog but I didn't have time/couldn't figure out how to integrate it into the current setup. Plus, there's a ton of stuff that I want (and people want) for Blog that I still need to implement - such as a way to search entries, the mail account monitoring thingy so that you can have multiple users maintaining the site etc ... But why am I talking about Blog here anyways? :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks for the plug for Blog :p I didn&#8217;t realize that my app compared that well with a $400 app &amp;lt;vbg&amp;gt; As for webdav support, somebody did ask me about that for Blog but I didn&#8217;t have time/couldn&#8217;t figure out how to integrate it into the current setup. Plus, there&#8217;s a ton of stuff that I want (and people want) for Blog that I still need to implement - such as a way to search entries, the mail account monitoring thingy so that you can have multiple users maintaining the site etc &#8230; But why am I talking about Blog here anyways? :p
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-113</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-113</guid>
					<description>Just cause they gave up three goals i nthe third to wind up tied at 3-3 (after leading 3-0) doesn't mean they suck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now, the &quot;kings&quot; there's a team that sucks.  The King of Kensington is a more royal king than any of those bozos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just cause they gave up three goals i nthe third to wind up tied at 3-3 (after leading 3-0) doesn&#8217;t mean they suck.</p>
	<p>Now, the &#8220;kings&#8221; there&#8217;s a team that sucks.  The King of Kensington is a more royal king than any of those bozos&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-112</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 20:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-112</guid>
					<description>Wow...I hadn't realized that anyone had comments for Greg.  I guess my 2 sense is &quot;How about those Habs!  Man they suck!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wow&#8230;I hadn&#8217;t realized that anyone had comments for Greg.  I guess my 2 sense is &#8220;How about those Habs!  Man they suck!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-111</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-111</guid>
					<description>It's a config on my end - I'm going to leave it as is, since the whole time change thing is just going to screw it up anyways...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It&#8217;s a config on my end - I&#8217;m going to leave it as is, since the whole time change thing is just going to screw it up anyways&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-110</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-110</guid>
					<description>yeah, I noticed the timestamps were odd..  I'm in a brain freeze tracking down an ethernet drive bug arghhhhh!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>yeah, I noticed the timestamps were odd..  I&#8217;m in a brain freeze tracking down an ethernet drive bug arghhhhh!!!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-109</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-109</guid>
					<description>/Me figured out who Cyber Skunk is - good ole' IP logging.  Course I kinda figured what with the speed of the response and everything. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sftp shouldn't require much from the client side of things, no?  What I've been led to believe is that once you've installed some sftp thing on NT, all your ftp clients can then deal with sftp sites transparently.  Correct me if I'm wrong, cause that's just second hand info.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wanna see something neat?  Look at the timestamps for these comments - they were posted before the original post was :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>/Me figured out who Cyber Skunk is - good ole&#8217; IP logging.  Course I kinda figured what with the speed of the response and everything. :)</p>
	<p>sftp shouldn&#8217;t require much from the client side of things, no?  What I&#8217;ve been led to believe is that once you&#8217;ve installed some sftp thing on NT, all your ftp clients can then deal with sftp sites transparently.  Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, cause that&#8217;s just second hand info.</p>
	<p>Wanna see something neat?  Look at the timestamps for these comments - they were posted before the original post was :P
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-108</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-108</guid>
					<description>Well, for web publishing needs I wish things such as Blog would support webdav.  Yes, it still may be plain text with respect to the password but you don't have to poke a million holes in your firewall or run special proxies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And webdav could be run over SSL which makes it secure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Builtin support for scp and or sftp into things such as bloggers would also be a nice feature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hehe, Cyber Skunk.. My old fidonet/bbs days alias.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;p.s. Of course, when IPv6/IPsec/DNSSEC gain wide deployment, things such as ftp and telnet will be secure again :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Well, for web publishing needs I wish things such as Blog would support webdav.  Yes, it still may be plain text with respect to the password but you don&#8217;t have to poke a million holes in your firewall or run special proxies.</p>
	<p>And webdav could be run over SSL which makes it secure.</p>
	<p>Builtin support for scp and or sftp into things such as bloggers would also be a nice feature.</p>
	<p>Hehe, Cyber Skunk.. My old fidonet/bbs days alias.</p>
	<p>p.s. Of course, when IPv6/IPsec/DNSSEC gain wide deployment, things such as ftp and telnet will be secure again :)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-107</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-107</guid>
					<description>But, what do you really think about it?&lt;br&gt;Yeah, it's not great, but it's the best option available to me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;/me wonders who Cyber Skunk is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>But, what do you really think about it?<br />
<br />Yeah, it&#8217;s not great, but it&#8217;s the best option available to me.</p>
	<p>/me wonders who Cyber Skunk is&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-106</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2001/12/13/it-is-the-loneliest-number/#comment-106</guid>
					<description>FTP should rot and die in hell!!!  Its the most hideously ridiculous protocol to ever hit the internet.  And it has stuck..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>FTP should rot and die in hell!!!  Its the most hideously ridiculous protocol to ever hit the internet.  And it has stuck..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
