<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picks</title>
	<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/</link>
	<description>Casually fanatic:  Wishywashy since the 20th century</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-883</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2004 18:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-883</guid>
					<description>Hi again;  Tried to send this before but I don't think it went.  Here are my picks - Philadelphia, Montreal, Detroit, and Colorado.
Jonathan's picks - Toronto, Montreal, Calgary &amp;#38; Colorado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hi again;  Tried to send this before but I don&#8217;t think it went.  Here are my picks - Philadelphia, Montreal, Detroit, and Colorado.<br />
Jonathan&#8217;s picks - Toronto, Montreal, Calgary &#38; Colorado.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-881</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 16:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-881</guid>
					<description>I've got no problem with you picking two teams that lost last night ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve got no problem with you picking two teams that lost last night ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-880</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2004 15:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-880</guid>
					<description>I know I'm too late so I can't officially win anymore, however my picks would have been detroit, colorado, TB, and philly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I know I&#8217;m too late so I can&#8217;t officially win anymore, however my picks would have been detroit, colorado, TB, and philly.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Katriona</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-877</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-877</guid>
					<description>Ok, I had a dream about my picks last night!  But I'm still torn...Definately going with Calgary and Toronto.  I really want to pick Montreal and since Dave picked Tampa...I guess I'll go with Montreal.  And I guess I'll go with San Jose, not too sure about that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Ok, I had a dream about my picks last night!  But I&#8217;m still torn&#8230;Definately going with Calgary and Toronto.  I really want to pick Montreal and since Dave picked Tampa&#8230;I guess I&#8217;ll go with Montreal.  And I guess I&#8217;ll go with San Jose, not too sure about that one.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: AmyJo</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-876</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 05:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-876</guid>
					<description>I'm gonna go with Calgary, Tampa Bay, Philly, and Colorado.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m gonna go with Calgary, Tampa Bay, Philly, and Colorado.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-875</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-875</guid>
					<description>bah!  sorry about the poor formatting, forgot to include line breaks..


short and sweet picks, calgary, sanjose, tampa bay, philly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>bah!  sorry about the poor formatting, forgot to include line breaks..</p>
	<p>short and sweet picks, calgary, sanjose, tampa bay, philly
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-874</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 21:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.nodecam.com/archives/2004/04/21/picks/#comment-874</guid>
					<description>Calgary over Detroit  -  I don't think they will pull it out, Detroit really pulled together last series, but I like Calgary better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
San Jose over Colorado  -  I this San Jose domintated the first round against St. Louis, and with the extra confidence, the avs will crumble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tampa Bay over Montreal  -  I'd like to pick the team from canada, but their shenanigans left a bad taste in my mouth after round one.  I'm  glad they beat boston, as I think all of their regular season ties were boring. Tampa bay looked better each game of the first series, so I think they will dominate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Flyers over Toronto  -  It's really too bad the leafs won, as they are a terribly boring team.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Calgary over Detroit  -  I don&#8217;t think they will pull it out, Detroit really pulled together last series, but I like Calgary better.</p>
	<p>San Jose over Colorado  -  I this San Jose domintated the first round against St. Louis, and with the extra confidence, the avs will crumble.</p>
	<p>Tampa Bay over Montreal  -  I&#8217;d like to pick the team from canada, but their shenanigans left a bad taste in my mouth after round one.  I&#8217;m  glad they beat boston, as I think all of their regular season ties were boring. Tampa bay looked better each game of the first series, so I think they will dominate.</p>
	<p>Flyers over Toronto  -  It&#8217;s really too bad the leafs won, as they are a terribly boring team.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
